Skip to content
Home Academy Satellite Internet Deep Dive OneWeb vs Starlink vs Amazon Kuiper
LESSON 03 OF 6

OneWeb vs Starlink vs Amazon Kuiper

Beginner ~9 min Slide deck Free

Starlink, OneWeb, and Amazon Kuiper are all racing to deliver satellite internet, but they've made fundamentally different architectural choices about altitude, terminal design, target market, and business model. Understanding these tradeoffs reveals what each does best — and worst.

Starlink, OneWeb, and Amazon Kuiper are all racing to deliver satellite internet, but they've made fundamentally different architectural choices about altitude, terminal design, target market, and business model. Understanding these tradeoffs reveals what each does best — and worst.

What this lesson covers

The Altitude Tradeoff

OneWeb chose 1,200 km while Starlink and Kuiper chose ~550–630 km. This single decision cascades through every aspect of the system.

Business Model Differences

The three constellations target different markets — and this shapes everything from terminal design to pricing.

Where Things Stand

The competitive landscape is evolving rapidly — here's the current state.

Key facts

💡Starlink's ~550 km altitude was chosen specifically so dead satellites deorbit naturally within ~5 years.
There's no single 'best' — Starlink leads on scale and consumer access; OneWeb on enterprise reliability; Kuiper on AWS integration.

Next: the physics that constraints them all — latency, bandwidth, and the altitude tradeoff.

All lessons in Satellite Internet Deep Dive
01How satellite internet works (vs fibre/5G)~8 min02Starlink architecture: shells, lasers, ground stations~9 min03OneWeb vs Starlink vs Amazon Kuiper~9 min04Latency, bandwidth, and the altitude tradeoff~9 min05Coverage gaps and polar coverage~8 min06Dark sky concerns and astronomy impact~9 min
← Starlink architecture: shells, lasers, ground stationsAll 6 LessonsLatency, bandwidth, and the altitude tradeoff →
🪐Support Us