The 1975 Registration Convention requires states to register their space objects nationally and with the UN, reporting orbit and function. It underpins attribution — knowing whose object is whose — though timeliness and detail of state reporting vary widely.
Understanding Registration Convention
Why registries matter more every year
Attribution is the currency of orbital accountability. Debris rules, norms of behaviour, liability claims and arms-control conversations all presuppose knowing whose object did what — and registration is the consent-based half of that answer, alongside independent tracking. Emerging activities raise the stakes: approving a servicer to dock with a satellite, or removing debris, legally requires engaging the state of registry, making stale or missing registrations an operational obstacle, not just a paperwork lapse.
Registry meets catalogue
Two parallel identification systems name every object: the legal one (UN registration under the convention) and the technical one (COSPAR international designators and national catalogue numbers assigned by tracking networks). They usually reconcile — the UN register uses COSPAR designators — but discrepancies are analytically rich: objects tracked but never registered, registered but vaguely described, or renamed through on-orbit transfer sketch the boundary where law and surveillance diverge.