Home Library Glossary Debris & Space Safety Hard-Body Radius
🛡️ Debris & Space Safety

Hard-Body Radius

Also known as: HBR, Combined Hard-Body Radius

Quick answer

The hard-body radius is the combined physical size of two objects in a conjunction — the radius of the circle that counts as a hit in the collision-probability integral. It is usually the sum of a sphere circumscribing each object, so it errs on the large side deliberately.

📘 Full definition✓ Reviewed 2026-09-07
The hard-body radius (HBR) is where physical reality enters the otherwise statistical world of conjunction assessment. The probability of collision asks how likely the true miss distance is to be smaller than "touching" — and HBR defines touching: each object is wrapped in the smallest sphere that contains it, appendages included, and the two radii are summed. If the objects' centres pass within that combined radius, they collide. In the encounter-plane picture, the HBR is the radius of the disc over which the combined position uncertainty is integrated at TCA. Values are modest — a CubeSat contributes well under a metre, a typical satellite a few metres, and a large station tens of metres once its solar wings are circumscribed — and screening systems apply conservative defaults (often ~20 m combined) when an object's true dimensions are unknown. The choice matters more than it looks: Pc scales roughly with the HBR squared in the usual regime, so doubling an assumed radius quadruples the computed risk. Circumscribing spheres deliberately overstate most geometries — two spacecraft crossing at an angle rarely present their full extent to each other — but in collision screening, overstating size is the safe direction to be wrong.
Definition
Sum of circumscribing spheres
appendages included
Typical values
~1–20 m combined
CubeSat pair → station-class
Unknown object default
Conservative (~20 m)
err large, not small
Sensitivity
Pc ∝ HBR²
size assumptions move risk fast

Understanding Hard-Body Radius

Why a sphere, when satellites are anything but

A real conjunction involves two tumbling or slewing shapes meeting at an unknown mutual orientation, at a relative speed that makes attitude prediction pointless. Rather than model that, practitioners collapse each object to its worst case: the circumscribing sphere, which guarantees the computed probability bounds the true one from above whatever the orientation. More refined treatments exist — projecting actual dimensions onto the encounter plane, or Monte Carlo sampling over attitudes — and fleet operators sometimes use them to trim false alarms for their own well-known vehicles. For the general catalogue, where many secondaries are debris of uncertain shape known mainly through their radar cross-section, the sphere remains the honest default.

Size from radar: estimating the unknown half

For the debris that makes up most conjunction secondaries, nobody has a datasheet. Trackers infer size from radar cross-section — how strongly the object reflects — which correlates loosely with physical dimensions but depends on material, shape and aspect. Screening pipelines bucket objects (small/medium/large) from RCS statistics and assign each bucket a standard radius contribution. The uncertainty this injects into Pc is real but bounded: because the assumed radii are conservative and the covariance usually dominates the calculation, an approximate HBR rarely changes a manoeuvre decision — though it is one more reason operators treat marginal Pc values as ranges, not verdicts.

See it live Every close approach on the conjunction feed involves two physical objects — the hard-body radius is how their size enters the risk maths. Open the conjunction feed →
📖 Learn More

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes — the circumscribing sphere contains the entire structure, wings, booms and antennas included. That is why a station's effective radius is set by its widest span, not its pressurised hull, and why deployables can dominate a satellite's contribution to the combined radius.
The screening authority applies defaults based on catalogue information, and operators can substitute better values for their own spacecraft when they rerun the numbers — one of the reasons CDMs carry the raw states and covariances rather than only a finished Pc.
At 10 km/s, yes. Any contact at orbital relative speeds is hypervelocity impact: even a clipped appendage transfers enormous energy, likely severs the component, sprays fragments and can destabilise the vehicle. Treating the whole envelope as solid is not pessimism — it reflects what impact physics does to "minor" contact.

Sources & References

Definitions are reviewed against primary sources. Last reviewed: 2026-09-07.