Home Library Glossary Debris & Space Safety CDM
🛡️ Debris & Space Safety

Conjunction Data Message (CDM)

Also known as: Conjunction Data Message, Conjunction Warning

Quick answer

A CDM (Conjunction Data Message) is the standardised alert issued when screening predicts two space objects will pass dangerously close. It states who, when and how close — time of closest approach, miss distance, relative velocity, collision probability and each object's uncertainty — in a machine-readable format.

📘 Full definition✓ Reviewed 2026-09-07
A Conjunction Data Message is the standard unit of collision warning in orbit. When conjunction screening predicts that two catalogued objects will pass within a defined screening volume, the screening authority issues a CDM to the affected operators. The message — standardised by CCSDS so that every operator's tools can parse it — identifies both objects, gives the predicted time of closest approach, the miss distance broken into radial, along-track and cross-track components, the relative velocity, a computed probability of collision, and, critically, each object's state vector and covariance so recipients can rerun the risk analysis themselves. A single close approach generates a series of CDMs, typically starting up to a week before the event and refreshing as new tracking sharpens the picture; operators watch the trend, since a conjunction that stays risky as uncertainty shrinks is the real signal to act. If the risk holds above threshold as TCA approaches, the owner plans a collision-avoidance manoeuvre. Large operators now ingest thousands of CDMs a day, which has pushed the whole workflow — triage, rescreening, manoeuvre decisions — towards automation.
Contains
TCA · miss · Pc · covariance
plus both objects' states
Standard
CCSDS format
machine-readable, operator-neutral
Cadence
Series per event
~days out, refining towards TCA
Volume
1000s/day for big fleets
triage is automated

Understanding CDM

Reading a CDM like an operator

The headline miss distance is the least useful number in the message. Operators look first at the probability of collision and its trend across successive CDMs: a Pc that climbs as covariance shrinks means the geometry is genuinely tight; one that collapses means the early alarm was uncertainty, not danger. Next they check the component breakdown — radial separation is the most trustworthy, because along-track errors dominate both objects' uncertainty. Then the data quality: how fresh is the secondary object's tracking, and is the primary's state based on the operator's own GPS ephemeris or on external tracking alone? Only with that context does the decision — manoeuvre, wait for the next message, or stand down — get made.

From screening to CDM to manoeuvre

StageTypical timingWhat happens
Catalogue screeningContinuousAll objects propagated, pairs checked against screening volumes
First CDM issued~7–3 days before TCAOperators alerted; risk usually still uncertainty-dominated
Refined CDMsDaily → hours before TCANew tracking tightens covariance; Pc trend watched
Decision point~1–2 days before TCAManoeuvre planned if Pc stays above threshold (commonly 1-in-10,000)
Post-manoeuvre screeningAfter burnNew trajectory rescreened — the avoidance itself must be screened
See it live This site's conjunction feed surfaces predicted close approaches between tracked objects — the same events that generate CDM traffic for operators. Open the conjunction feed →
📖 Learn More

Frequently Asked Questions

Primarily the US military's space-surveillance operation, which screens the public catalogue and warns operators worldwide free of charge; civil space-traffic systems and commercial SSA providers issue them too. Operators of large constellations also screen among themselves, exchanging ephemerides directly so both sides compute from the best available data.
No — the overwhelming majority are routine. Screening volumes are deliberately generous, so most messages describe passes that end up comfortably clear once uncertainty shrinks. Operators typically act on a small fraction of events, using probability thresholds around 1-in-10,000 to separate the genuinely risky from the merely close.
Then nobody can act — neither object can manoeuvre, and the pass simply happens. Screening still matters: a debris-on-debris collision would spray new fragments across the orbit, so agencies monitor such events and model the consequences. Reducing this unmanoeuvrable background risk is the core argument for debris removal.

Sources & References

Definitions are reviewed against primary sources. Last reviewed: 2026-09-07.