Home Library Glossary Debris & Space Safety TCA
🛡️ Debris & Space Safety

Time of Closest Approach (TCA)

Also known as: Time of Closest Approach, Closest Approach Time

Quick answer

TCA — time of closest approach — is the predicted instant two space objects reach minimum separation during a conjunction. Every close-approach warning is anchored to it: miss distance, relative velocity and collision probability are all quoted at TCA, and every avoidance decision counts down to it.

📘 Full definition✓ Reviewed 2026-09-07
The time of closest approach is the anchor point of every conjunction: the predicted instant at which the distance between two objects reaches its minimum. Screening systems find it by propagating both orbits and locating the moment the relative range bottoms out; everything else in a conjunction data message — the miss distance and its radial/along-track/cross-track components, the relative velocity, the probability of collision — is evaluated at that instant. Encounters at orbital speed are brutally brief: two LEO objects typically close at 7–15 km/s, so the entire dangerous interaction spans milliseconds around TCA, which is why the event is modelled as an effectively instantaneous crossing of the "encounter plane" perpendicular to the relative velocity. TCA is also the operational clock. CDM series are labelled by hours-to-TCA, tracking is tasked to refine the picture before it, and a collision-avoidance manoeuvre must be executed early enough — typically at least half an orbit prior — for a small burn to build separation by the time the moment arrives. The predicted TCA itself shifts slightly between updates as fresh tracking adjusts both orbits, usually by fractions of a second, and any large jump signals a manoeuvre or a data problem rather than physics.
Defines
Minimum-separation instant
all conjunction values quoted here
LEO closing speed
7–15 km/s
encounter lasts milliseconds
Countdown unit
Hours-to-TCA
CDMs refine as it approaches
Manoeuvre deadline
≥ half an orbit before
small burns need time to grow

Understanding TCA

The encounter plane picture

Because the dangerous window is so short, analysts collapse the 3-D fly-by into a 2-D picture: a plane through one object, perpendicular to the relative velocity, crossed by the other object at TCA. Miss distance becomes a point on that plane, and both objects' covariances project onto it as ellipses. The probability of collision is then the chance that the crossing point lands within the combined hard-body radius — an integral over a disc on the encounter plane. The geometry also explains why the radial component of miss distance is the most trusted: orbital uncertainty stretches along-track, so a healthy radial gap survives data errors that would swallow an along-track one.

Why manoeuvring early beats manoeuvring hard

Orbital mechanics rewards patience. A tiny along-track burn changes the orbital period slightly, and the displacement it buys compounds every revolution — a few centimetres per second applied a day before TCA can shift the encounter by kilometres, while the same burn an hour before achieves metres. This is why the decision timeline in conjunction operations is so disciplined: wait as long as possible for tracking to firm up (late CDMs carry the truth), but never so long that the remaining time cannot convert a feasible burn into a safe distance. Screening the post-manoeuvre trajectory closes the loop, confirming the dodge does not create a new conjunction elsewhere.

See it live Each event on the conjunction feed carries its predicted closest-approach time — watch upcoming encounters count down. Open the conjunction feed →
📖 Learn More

Frequently Asked Questions

Effectively yes. If the objects were going to hit, contact would occur within milliseconds of the predicted TCA — the encounter is so fast that TCA and impact time are indistinguishable for planning. That is why avoidance work treats TCA as the single deadline for all decisions.
Usually to well under a second, and it firms up as the event nears — timing along an orbit is tightly constrained by the objects' measured periods. The harder question is the geometry at that instant: whether the separation is hundreds of metres or a couple of kilometres, which is where covariance dominates.
Almost always: nothing observable. Either the operator manoeuvred days earlier and the pass is wide, or the risk was retired by better tracking and no action was needed. For unmanoeuvrable objects the moment simply passes — and trackers confirm afterwards that both objects still appear where their orbits predict.

Sources & References

Definitions are reviewed against primary sources. Last reviewed: 2026-09-07.