Skip to content
Home › Library › Space Debris › Re-entry Tracker › Forecast Accuracy

22 Years of Official PredictionsRe-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026

Across 2,221 re-entries from July 2004 to August 2026, official re-entry predictions made one to three days ahead missed by a typical 3.9 hours. In the final six hours, the typical miss was 17 minutes.

Version 1. Last updated . Figures are frozen for re-entries up to 22 August 2026; from 23 August 2026 the live panel carries on, updated hourly. Live forecast accuracy

How Close Were the Predictions?

How close official re-entry predictions came to the final time, by how far ahead they were issued. A prediction "held" when the final time fell inside its stated window.

Middle half of misses Typical miss Typical stated window

Within 6 hours ahead17 mintypical miss87% held their window
6 to 24 hours ahead53 mintypical miss91% held their window
1 to 3 days ahead3.9 htypical miss86% held their window
More than 3 days ahead8 htypical miss81% held their window

Graded using Orbital Radar verification methods: 13,018 official predictions for 2,221 re-entries, 25 July 2004 to 22 August 2026. Sources and methods

What 22 Years Show

Long-range predictions come too soon

More than three days ahead, 62% of objects re-entered later than predicted, and the typical prediction was 3.1 hours early. The pattern holds in 22 of the 23 years since 2004; the exception is 2025.

Starlink is the hardest to predict

One to three days ahead, predictions for Starlink satellites, nearly all of them re-entering since 2020, missed by a typical 5.8 hours, against 3 hours for all other objects since 2004. At that range, Starlink came down earlier than predicted 72% of the time.

Misses have grown since 2020

One to three days ahead, the typical miss was 3 hours in 2004 to 2013, 2.8 hours in 2014 to 2019 and 4.5 hours in 2020 to 2026, a period that includes the latest solar maximum and the first mass Starlink re-entries.

Which Objects Are Hardest to Predict?

Typical miss by period, type of object, mass, Starlink and solar activity, at each lead time.

GroupWithin 6 h6 to 24 h1 to 3 daysOver 3 days
By period
2004 to 20139 min34 min3 h6.4 h
2014 to 201910 min33 min2.8 h6.3 h
2020 to 202621 min61 min4.5 h9.2 h
Object type
Rocket bodies11 min40 min2.9 h5.9 h
Debris13 min58 min2.9 h5.1 h
Payloads22 min62 min5.1 h11 h
Mass
2 t and over11 min41 min3.2 h6.5 h
500 kg to 2 t17 min52 min3.4 h6.8 h
Under 500 kg21 min59 min4.7 h9.6 h
Starlink
Starlink26 min69 min5.8 h13.4 h
All other objects12 min43 min3 h6.1 h
Solar activity
Low10 min35 min2.8 h7 h
Moderate17 min59 min4.2 h9.6 h
High24 min60 min4.9 h7.3 h

Closer than the 22-year typical Further off Italicfewer than 30 predictions or 10 re-entries

Solar activity is the 81-day average solar radio flux when the prediction was made: low under 100, moderate 100 to 150, high 150 and over. Space weather now

Year by Year

Typical miss by year of re-entry and lead time, with the number of re-entries graded each year.

YearRe-entriesWithin 6 h6 to 24 h1 to 3 daysOver 3 days
2004198 min44 min3.6 h6.6 h
20053712 min47 min2.7 h8.4 h
2006288 min24 min2.9 h6.8 h
2007319 min29 min3.1 h7.1 h
20083110 min32 min3.7 h8.9 h
2009335 min40 min2.1 h6.1 h
2010348 min38 min2.4 h4.8 h
2011417 min26 min2.1 h5.5 h
2012399 min37 min3.3 h8.3 h
20133112 min26 min3.4 h4.5 h
2014447 min52 min3.4 h5.1 h
2015319 min25 min2.9 h7.1 h
2016318 min40 min2.4 h7.1 h
20171211 min42 min2.5 h4.5 h
2018449 min20 min2.5 h6.5 h
20195611 min42 min3 h6.6 h
20205212 min48 min3 h8.1 h
202110515 min35 min2.9 h7.1 h
202213914 min56 min3.4 h7.8 h
202317220 min52 min3.2 h5 h
202436522 min65 min4.8 h6.7 h
202551129 min64 min5.5 h12.2 h
202633525 min72 min5 h13.2 h

Closer than the 22-year typical Further off Italicfewer than 30 predictions or 10 re-entries

Questions

How accurate are satellite re-entry predictions?

It depends on how far ahead they are made. From July 2004 to August 2026, official predictions made within six hours of re-entry missed by a typical 17 minutes; six to 24 hours ahead, by 53 minutes; one to three days ahead, by 3.9 hours; and more than three days ahead, by 8 hours. The final time fell inside the stated window for 81% to 91% of predictions.

Do objects re-enter earlier or later than predicted?

Within three days of re-entry, about 62% of objects came down earlier than predicted, mostly in the years since 2020. More than three days ahead it reverses: 62% re-entered later than predicted and the typical prediction was 3.1 hours early, in 22 of the 23 years since 2004.

Are Starlink re-entries harder to predict?

On this record, yes. One to three days ahead, predictions for Starlink satellites missed by a typical 5.8 hours, against 3 hours for all other objects, and Starlink came down earlier than predicted 72% of the time at that range. Nearly all Starlink re-entries date from 2020 onwards.

Why do re-entry predictions change?

The re-entry time depends on atmospheric drag, which rises and falls with solar activity and is hard to forecast days ahead. Each new prediction uses fresher tracking, so the window narrows as re-entry nears. One to three days ahead, the typical miss was 2.8 hours at low solar activity and 4.9 hours at high.

How to Read These Figures

  • Typical miss is the median gap between a prediction and the final official re-entry time. Half of the predictions came closer, half missed by more.
  • Held means the final time fell inside the prediction's stated window. Windows before 2014 were about twice as wide, so compare held rates within a period, not across periods.
  • The reference is the final official re-entry time, not an independent measurement. Only re-entries with a final time precise to five minutes can be graded: 2,221 of 3,754 objects. Fewer qualify from 2013 to 2020. Every re-entry is also entered in the Orbital Register.
  • Figures count predictions, as on the live panel, so objects with many updates count more. Objects with a single prediction cannot be graded.

Cite this page

Pick a style, then copy it or download it for your reference manager.

Orbital Radar. (2026, November 9). Re-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026. Retrieved November 9, 2026, from https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy

“Re-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026.” Orbital Radar, 9 Nov. 2026, orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy. Accessed 9 Nov. 2026.

Orbital Radar (2026) Re-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026. Available at: https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy (Accessed: 9 November 2026).

Orbital Radar. “Re-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026.” Last modified November 9, 2026. https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy.

@misc{orbitalradar_satellite_reentry_tracker_forecast_accuracy,
  author       = {{Orbital Radar}},
  title        = {Re-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = nov,
  howpublished = {\url{https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy}},
  url          = {https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy},
  urldate      = {2026-11-09},
  note         = {Accessed 2026-11-09}
}
TY  - ELEC
AU  - Orbital Radar,
TI  - Re-entry Forecast Accuracy, 2004-2026
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/09
PB  - Orbital Radar
UR  - https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-reentry-tracker/forecast-accuracy
Y2  - 2026/11/09
LA  - en
ER  - 
Download RISFor Zotero, EndNote and Mendeley

Live figures change, so keep the date you accessed the page. How to cite Orbital Radar

Last updated: