Home Library Spacecraft Boeing Starliner
🛸 Spacecraft

Boeing Starliner

Boeing's CST-100 crew capsule for NASA's Commercial Crew Programme — designed to carry astronauts to the ISS, with a long and troubled development history that has put the programme's future in doubt.

7
Max Crew
4.56 m
Diameter
10×
Reuse Target
⚠️ Under Review
Programme Status

Overview

The CST-100 Starliner is a crew capsule developed by Boeing under NASA's Commercial Crew Programme (CCP), alongside SpaceX's Crew Dragon. Starliner is designed to carry up to 7 astronauts to the International Space Station, launching atop a ULA Atlas V rocket (and eventually Vulcan Centaur). However, Starliner's development has been marked by significant delays, software errors and thruster issues that have made it one of the most troubled spacecraft programmes in modern spaceflight.

Key Specifications

ParameterValue
ManufacturerBoeing
Crew CapacityUp to 7 (4 for NASA missions)
Diameter4.56 m (15 ft)
Height5.03 m (capsule + service module)
Mass~13,000 kg
Habitable Volume11 m³
Launch VehicleAtlas V N22 / Vulcan Centaur
Launch SiteSLC-41, Cape Canaveral
LandingAirbag-assisted land landing (western US)
Abort System4 × Launch Abort Engines (pusher configuration)
ReusabilityCapsule designed for 10 flights

Development History

OFT-1 (December 2019): The first uncrewed Orbital Flight Test failed to reach the ISS due to a mission elapsed timer software error that caused excessive thruster firings. A second critical software bug was discovered during the mission that could have caused a catastrophic collision between the capsule and service module during separation. The capsule returned safely but never reached the station.

OFT-2 (May 2022): The second uncrewed test reached the ISS successfully, but experienced thruster anomalies during approach and docking. Two of the capsule's orbital manoeuvring thrusters failed during flight.

CFT (Crew Flight Test, June 2024): The first crewed flight carried NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the ISS. During approach, five of Starliner's 28 reaction control thrusters failed, and helium leaks were detected in the propulsion system. NASA ultimately decided the thruster issues posed too much risk for crew return. Wilmore and Williams remained on the ISS, and Starliner returned to Earth uncrewed in September 2024. The astronauts returned months later aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon on the Crew-9 mission.

Mission Log

MissionDateTypeOutcome
Pad Abort TestNov 2019Abort testPartial success (1 of 3 parachutes failed)
OFT-1Dec 2019Uncrewed test❌ Failed to reach ISS (software error)
OFT-2May 2022Uncrewed test⚠️ Reached ISS; 2 thruster failures
CFTJun 2024Crewed test⚠️ Reached ISS; 5 thruster failures, helium leaks; crew returned via Dragon

Land Landing

Unlike Dragon (which splashes down in the ocean), Starliner is designed for land landings using airbags deployed beneath the heat shield. This approach aims to reduce recovery costs and simplify capsule refurbishment for reuse. Landing sites are planned in the western United States (White Sands, New Mexico being the primary site).

Starliner vs Crew Dragon

ParameterStarlinerCrew Dragon
Crew4 (7 max)4 (7 max)
Diameter4.56 m4.0 m
Volume11 m³9.3 m³
LandingAirbag land landingOcean splashdown
Abort4 × LAE (pusher)8 × SuperDraco (pusher)
Launch VehicleAtlas V / VulcanFalcon 9
Reuse Target10 flights4+ proven
Operational Missions010+
NASA Contract$4.2 billion$2.6 billion

Programme Status

Following the CFT thruster and helium leak issues, the future of the Starliner programme is uncertain. Boeing has absorbed over $1.6 billion in cost overruns on the fixed-price CCP contract. NASA has expressed continued interest in maintaining two crew transport providers for redundancy, but operational Starliner crew rotation missions depend on resolving the propulsion system issues definitively. As of 2026, no further Starliner missions have been scheduled.

🛰️

Which spacecraft for your mission?

Pick a mission profile and we'll rank the world's crewed and cargo spacecraft by suitability — capability, flight heritage, reusability and fit. A live calculation across our spacecraft catalogue, not a static list.

🛠️

Anatomy & mission profile

Docking portPressurised cabinHeat shieldService module / trunk
  • Crew7 max (4 typical)
  • Pressurised vol11 m³
  • Mass13,000 kg
  • Launch vehicleAtlas V / Vulcan
  • Abort system4× launch-abort engines (pusher)
  • LandingAirbag-cushioned ground landing

Pressurised volume to scale

7.5 m³Soyuz MS7.6 m³Progress9.3 m³Crew Dragon9.3 m³Cargo Dragon11 m³Starliner

Approximate pressurised volume — a sense of how roomy each vehicle is for crew or cargo.

📊

Starliner vs every crew & cargo spacecraft

Spacecraft Type Crew Cargo kg Vol m³ Reuse Debut Status
🇺🇸 Starliner you are here Crew capsule 7 11 ♻︎ Yes 2019 Under review
🇺🇸 Crew Dragon Crew capsule 7 9.3 ♻︎ Yes 2020 Operational
🇺🇸 Cargo Dragon Cargo spacecraft 6,000 9.3 ♻︎ Yes 2020 Operational
🇺🇸 Dragon Crew + cargo family 7 6,000 9.3 ♻︎ Yes 2010 Operational
🇺🇸 Orion Deep-space crew capsule 4 19.6 No 2022 Pre-operational
🇷🇺 Soyuz MS Crew capsule 3 7.5 No 1967 Operational
🇨🇳 Shenzhou Crew capsule 3 7 No 2003 Operational
🇷🇺 Progress Cargo spacecraft 2,400 7.6 No 1978 Operational
🇨🇳 Tianzhou Cargo spacecraft 6,700 18.1 No 2017 Operational
🇺🇸 Cygnus Cargo spacecraft 3,750 27 No 2013 Operational
🇺🇸 Dream Chaser Cargo spaceplane 5,500 16 ♻︎ Yes Planned In development
🇺🇸 Starship HLS Crewed lunar lander 4 100,000 100 ♻︎ Yes Planned In development
🇯🇵 HTV-X Cargo spacecraft 5,850 30 No Planned In development

Tap any column to sort · crew = maximum seats, cargo = pressurised + unpressurised upmass · figures are best estimates as of 2026.

🔗

Track Starliner across Orbital Radar

Frequently Asked Questions

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams launched on Starliner CFT in June 2024 but could not return due to thruster failures and helium leaks. They remained on the ISS and returned months later aboard SpaceX Crew Dragon (Crew-9 mission).

As of 2026, Starliner has not been officially cancelled, but no further missions are scheduled. Boeing has absorbed over $1.6 billion in cost overruns. NASA continues to evaluate the programme's future.

Starliner is slightly larger and lands on land rather than water. However, Crew Dragon has completed 10+ operational missions while Starliner has completed zero. See the comparison table above.

It uses airbags beneath the heat shield for land landings at White Sands, New Mexico. This aims to reduce recovery costs and simplify refurbishment compared to ocean splashdown.

🛰️ Explore the Full Library
175+ pages of trackers, statistics, satellite profiles, space weather and more.
Open Library →
Last updated: